Americans have been unmercifully lied to non-stop 24/7 by the U.S. pro-war lobby through their usual media mouthpieces, shamelessly propagating CIA and think tank lies designed to gain more public and Congressional support for funding Ukraine.

HOW DID THIS START AND WHO STARTED IT?
Did this start with Putin invading Ukraine? No it didn’t.

Why did Putin invade Ukraine? Putin told the world that he was going to stop Ukrainian Nazis from shelling Russians in the Donetsk region and demilitarize Ukraine of all Ukrainian Nazi groups; but Putin’s primary reason for invasion was the very reason Putin and global security experts warned of for over 20 years: The U.S. better stop trying to convert Ukraine to a NATO member nation so the U.S. can place NATO missile bases on the Russia-Ukraine border – or else Putin may invade Ukraine.

Even former U.S. Secretary of Defense Bill Gates warned in his book that unless the U.S. stops encroaching on Russian borders, Putin may invade Ukraine.


IN THE BEGINNING

In the beginning there was the infamous Zionist bloodthirsty war-criming think tank, PNAC: PROJECT FOR A NEW AMERICAN CENTURY: Richard Pearle, Paul Wolfowitz,  R. James Woolsey, Elliott Abrams, Donald Rumsfeld, Robert Zoellick, and John Bolton.

PNAC not only wrote the infamous war plan to invade Iraq, but also wrote THE PLAN FOR THE U.S. TO OVERTHROW THE DEMOCRATICALLY-ELECTED GOVERNMENT OF UKRAINE, INSTALL A CLIENT REGIME DICTATOR WHO WILL SUPPORT UKRAINE BECOMING A NATO MEMBER STATE AND PLACE U.S./NATO MISSILE BASES ON THE RUSSIA-UKRAINE BORDER.

Yes, in and around 1997-2000 when PNAC wrote the Iraq War Plan, PNAC also wrote the U.S. plan to overthrow Ukraine by force, install a U.S. puppet dictator and install nuclear missile bases on Putin’s borders. WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG?

Do you remember when President George W. Bush suddenly and unilaterally withdrew from the ABM TREATY without consulting Congress or anyone other than PNAC? Putin and the world called it “an act of war” against Russia. PNAC told Dubya it had to be done in order to sucessfully complete their goal of placing nuclear missile bases on the Russian border.


Even yesterday an MSNBC guest was ranting and raving, complaining about about Putin not wanting U.S. missile bases on his border. Incredible! How dare Putin not want US/NATO nuclear missiles on his border?

The last time a nation tried to put nuclear missiles 90 miles from the U.S. border, the U.S. threatened total nuclear annihilation if they didn’t remove the threat immediately.

The obvious question an interested observer should ask is, Why in the hell is the U.S. Congress, White House and government agencies hell bent on not only placing nukes on Russia’s borders, but actually prefering to launch a nuclear first strike on Russia? Why the endless flood of U.S. media hate speech directed at Russia and all things Russian?

The answer is, the pro-war lobby is an unholy alliance who shares the totally unrealistic but common goal and dream of deposing Putin, and overthrowing the Russian government: U.S. State Dept., AIPAC, CIA, MIC, US defense contractors and their Congressional lobbyists.

But the number one reason Zionists want to use the U.S. government to go to war with Russia is because Russia and Iran are the only things standing in the way of Israel EXPANDING far beyond its original borders and realizing its long term dream of “Greater Israel” and finally overthrowing the Assad government and stealing all of Syria.

HOW WILL THE WAR IN UKRAINE END?

The war in Ukraine will end when Putin perceives no threat of Ukraine becoming a member of NATO.

The U.S. is hellbent on making Ukraine a NATO member, no matter how many Ukrainian men must sacrifice their lives.

The lying Zelensky claims 450,000 Russian soldiers killed and 31,000 Ukrainians killed; when in fact the very opposite is true: Russia has killed approx. 450,000 Ukrainians and lost approx. 31,000 soldiers.

It’s worth noting that Zelensky complains about being outgunned by Russian forces firing 10 shells for every one Ukrainian shell fired, yet Zelensky expects the world to believe Ukraine is killing Russians at a 10 to 1 ratio.

With each passing day, Putin realizes that the US-backed Zelensky regime will never agree to NEUTRALITY FOR UKRAINE instead of NATO membership.

If Zelensky and the U.S. were interested in preserving what is left of Ukraine, Zelensky and the U.S. should sign a pact with Russia agreeing to a permanent and lasting state of neutrality for Ukraine; guaranteeing that Ukraine would never become a member of NATO and place missile bases on Russia’s borders.

Problem is, Zelensky and U.S. officials don’t give a crap about the Ukrainian people – never did.

That’s why Zelensky and U.S. officials will continue to do what they’ve been doing until Russian tanks roll through Kiev.

Once Putin’s tanks roll through Kiev and Zelensky and the gang absconds from Kiev and Ukraine, the U.S. media and U.S. officials will PANIC and have to explain, just how in the hell did they get everything so wrong?

You think Biden looks bad now? Wait a couple of months….Russia is about to unleash their final offensive and 200 mile push to Kiev, once Russian forces knock off Kharkiv.

I highly recommend watching Brian Berletic’s video(s) updates re: Ukraine:

Putin was getting restless since 15 Baltic states joined NATO over the past 20 years – a direct violation of the Warsaw Pact President Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachov signed guaranteeing the breakup of the Soviet Union and the complete elimination of Ukraine’s nuclear arsenal, in exchange for the U.S.-NATO promise to never move ONE INCH EAST OF THE BERLIN WALL; and that the U.S. and NATO would defend Ukraine in case of military emergency.

Putin complained about NATO and the U.S. violating these peace agreements for years and years before Putin moved a muscle. To understand the agreements the U.S. made with Russia and Ukraine, Read This >>>

Take a look at this long list of foreign policy experts who warned everyone if NATO and the U.S. didn’t stop their eastern expansionism, placing missile bases near Russia, there was a great probability Putin would respond militarily:

1. *George #Kennan, America’s foreign policy strategist*, the architect of the U.S. cold war strategy. As early as 1998 he warned that NATO expansion was a “tragic mistake” that ought to ultimately provoke a “bad reaction from Russia.”

2. *Henry #Kissinger*, in 2014. He warned that “to Russia, Ukraine can never be just a foreign country” and that the West therefore needs a policy that is aimed at “reconciliation.”
He was also adamant that “Ukraine should not join NATO.”

3. *John Mearsheimer* – arguably the leading geopolitical scholar in the US today – in 2015: “The West is leading Ukraine down the primrose path and the end result is that Ukraine is going to get wrecked […] What we’re doing is in fact encouraging that outcome.”

4. *Jack F. Matlock Jr.*, US Ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987-1991, warning in 1997 that NATO expansion was “the most profound strategic blunder, [encouraging] a chain of events that could produce the most serious security threat […] since the Soviet Union collapsed.”

5. Clinton’s defense secretary *William Perry* explained, in his memoir, that to him NATO enlargement is the cause of “the rupture in relations with Russia” and that in 1996 he was so opposed to it that “in the strength of my conviction, I considered resigning.”

6. *Stephen Cohen*, a famed scholar of Russian studies, warning in 2014 that “if we move NATO forces toward Russia’s borders […] it’s obviously gonna militarize the situation [and] Russia will not back off, this is existential.”

7. *CIA director Bill Burns* in 2008: “Ukrainian entry into NATO is the brightest of all redlines for [Russia]” and “I have yet to find anyone who views Ukraine in NATO as anything other than a direct challenge to Russian interests”. (He was then Ambassador to Moscow in 2008 when he wrote this memo). He is now director of the CIA. ‘08 memo ‘Nyet Means Nyet: Russia’s NATO Enlargement Redlines’

8. Russian-American journalist *Vladimir Pozner*, in 2018, stated that: NATO expansion in Ukraine is unacceptable to the Russian, that there has to be a compromise where “Ukraine, guaranteed, will not become a member of NATO.”

9. *Malcolm #Fraser, 22nd prime minister of Australia*, warned in 2014 that “the move east [by NATO is] provocative, unwise and a very clear signal to Russia”. He adds that this leads to a “difficult and extraordinarily dangerous problem.”

10. *Paul #Keating, former Australian PM, in 1997*: expanding NATO is “an error which may rank in the end with the strategic miscalculations which prevented Germany from taking its full place in the international system [in early 20th]”

11. *Former US defense secretary Bob Gates* in his 2015 memoirs: “Moving so quickly [to expand NATO] was a mistake. […] Trying to bring Georgia and Ukraine into NATO was truly overreaching [and] an especially monumental provocation.”

12. *Pat Buchanan*, in his 1999 book A Republic, Not an Empire: “By moving NATO onto Russia’s front porch, we have scheduled a twenty-first-century confrontation.”

13. In 1997, a group of individuals including *Robert McNamara, Bill Bradley & Gary Hart wrote a letter to Bill Clinton* warning the “US led effort to expand NATO is a policy error of historic proportions” and would “foster instability” in Europe. Today it’s fringe, traitorous position.

14. *Dmitriy Trenin* expressed concern that Ukraine was, in the LT, the most potentially destabilizing factor in US-Russian relations, given the level of emotion & neuralgia triggered by its quest for NATO membership.

15. *Sir Roderic Lyne, former British ambassador to Russia*, warned a year ago that “[pushing] Ukraine into NATO […] is stupid on every level.” He adds “if you want to start a war with Russia, that’s the best way of doing it.”

16. Even last year, *famous economist Jeffrey #Sachs*, writing a column in the FT warning that “NATO enlargement is utterly misguided and risky. True friends of Ukraine, and of global peace, should be calling for a US and NATO compromise with Russia.”

17. *Fiona Hill* :”We warned [George Bush] that Mr. Putin would view steps to bring Ukraine and Georgia closer to NATO as a provocative move that would likely provoke pre-emptive Russian military action. But ultimately, our warnings weren’t heeded.”

18. *Aleksandr Dugin*, in 1997, had predicted everything that Putin has done, in his book “Foundation of Geopolitics.”

These officials knew that U.S. and NATO expansionism while trying to rope Ukraine into NATO, was crossing Russia’s red line and would most likely result in deadly consequences.

My point is the evidence indicates the U.S. – the State Dept. in particular, intentionally provoked Putin into military action by U.S. conduct on the ground in Ukraine and the Baltic States.

The U.S. sought to use Ukraine as a battering ram to try to dislodge Putin from power and destroy Russia. The U.S. knows the U.S. cannot magically transform Russia into a democracy, so the U.S. wants to kill it instead. The PRO-WAR LOBBY wants a nuclear exchange with Russia.

The U.S. State Dept. makes the false claim propaganda Putin is in danger of being overthrown by his own people and his own military for invading Ukraine.

That’s definitely pro-war propaganda in view of the fact Putin enjoys a popularity rating about twice that of Joe Biden.

There’s ZERO PER CENT CHANCE of Putin being overthrown by his people and military, yet that’s one of the many lies being fed to the American people in the PRO-WAR LOBBY’s quest to drum up even more support for U.S. military action in Ukraine and more U.S. defense contractor arms to Ukraine.

190809-N-AW818-889.NAVAL SUPPORT FACILITY DEVESELU, Romania (Aug. 9, 2019) Dark clouds gather before a summer rain storm over the U.S. Navy base in Romania, home to NATO’s Aegis Ashore Ballistic Missile Defense System (AABMDS) site, after completing a long-planned systems update, Aug. 9, 2019. During the maintenance period, the U.S. fulfilled its commitment to NATO’s Ballistic Missile Defense(BMD) by the temporary deployment of a Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system to the Naval Support Facility in Deveselu, Romania. The deployment of the U.S. Army’s THAAD battery to Romania lasted about six weeks while Aegis Ashore software and other equipment was updated. In April, the task force deployed to NSFD where they integrated into the existing NATO BMD architecture during a period of routine maintenance and upgrade of the Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System located there. The THAAD system re-deployed back to the U.S. and NATO’s Aegis Ashore has resumed full functionality and remains focused on potential threats from outside the Euro-Atlantic area. (U.S. Navy photo by Lt. Amy Forsythe/Released)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *